Worried about your data’s security in the near future? With quantum computing vs current encryption on the horizon, traditional encryption methods may soon be outdated. Let’s explore why 2026 could be the tipping point for data protection

Google’s quantum computer completed in 200 seconds what the world’s most powerful supercomputer would need 10,000 years to finish. This breakthrough shows quantum computing’s revolutionary potential and the cybersecurity challenges that lie ahead. The quantum computing market could reach US$50 billion by 2030. Most organizations in the US expect these systems to become mainstream by then.

But this technological leap creates serious quantum computing security risks. 73% of US businesses think quantum-enabled cybercriminals will break current encryption methods. The threat exists right now. Attackers already collect encrypted data and plan to decrypt it when quantum computers become powerful enough – a strategy called “harvest now, decrypt later.” The U.S. government has invested over $800 million in quantum research. Tech giants like Apple develop quantum-resistant protocols. We need to understand why our encryption methods won’t protect our data in the coming years.

The Quantum Computing Revolution: Understanding the Threat

Classical computers use bits that represent either 0 or 1. Quantum computers operate according to quantum physics principles, which creates a completely new way of computing with capabilities we’ve never seen before. This transformation brings very serious quantum computing security risks to our digital world.

As quantum computing evolves, it could have a significant impact on industries like manufacturing, where robotics plays a key role. The future of robotics in manufacturing explores how advanced robotics could integrate with quantum technologies, leading to even more automation and efficiency, but also increasing the need for robust encryption methods to secure these systems.

How Quantum Computers Process Information Differently

Quantum computers utilize qubits instead of classical bits. These qubits can represent both 0 and 1 at the same time through a quantum property called superposition. This unique feature lets quantum systems process information in ways traditional computers simply cannot. Quantum computing also uses entanglement—a quantum bond between qubits that produces similar results whatever the physical distance.

Each additional qubit increases a quantum computer’s power exponentially, not linearly. Traditional computers gain power step by step when adding bits. Quantum systems, however, follow a 2^n pattern, where n represents the number of qubits. This exponential growth creates multi-dimensional computational spaces that solve problems that were impossible before.

We have a long way to go, but we can build on this progress. Quantum computers need very controlled environments. They often run at temperatures close to absolute zero (-273.15°C) to maintain quantum coherence. Quantum states break easily, and any disturbance can cause decoherence that disrupts calculations.

Shor’s Algorithm: The Encryption Killer

Mathematician Peter Shor created an algorithm in 1994 that turned quantum computing from a theoretical curiosity into a cybersecurity nightmare. His algorithm showed how quantum computers could quickly factor large numbers—the basic security principle behind modern encryption.

The impact could be massive. A cryptographically relevant quantum computer using Shor’s algorithm might complete in seconds what today’s supercomputers would need trillions of years to do. This breakthrough threatens almost all public key infrastructure we commonly use, including RSA, Diffie-Hellman, Elliptic Curve Cryptography (ECC), and Elliptic Curve Diffie-Hellman (ECDH).

The global race to develop quantum-resistant cryptography has picked up speed. About 60% of Canadian organizations and 78% in the US think quantum computers will become mainstream by 2030. US businesses are concerned too—73% believe cybercriminals will eventually use quantum computing to break current encryption protocols.

Current Timeline of Quantum Computing Development

Quantum computing has made steady progress since Shor’s breakthrough. Here are the major milestones:

• 2011: D-Wave Systems released the first commercial quantum annealer
• 2016: IBM made quantum computing accessible via cloud services
• 2019: Google claimed “quantum supremacy” with its 53-qubit Sycamore processor. It completed a calculation in 200 seconds that would supposedly take a supercomputer 10,000 years

Most experts predict cryptographically relevant quantum computers capable of running Shor’s algorithm at scale won’t arrive until the 2030s at least. The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) aims to standardize post-quantum cryptography to reduce quantum risks by 2035.

Organizations face an immediate threat called “harvest now, decrypt later.” Adversaries steal encrypted data today and wait to decrypt it when quantum capabilities mature. This strategy puts sensitive information with long-term value at risk today, whatever the timeline for quantum computers to achieve full cryptographic relevance.

Why 2026 Is the Critical Quantum Security Milestone

The quantum security landscape faces a dramatic shift in 2026. Expert projections and organizational roadmaps point to quantum computing capabilities that could break our current cryptographic systems[link_1]. This reality pushes us to rethink cybersecurity completely.

NIST’s Post-Quantum Cryptography Timeline

The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) started its post-quantum cryptography standardization process in 2016. They recognized quantum computers would threaten our current encryption methods. Their multi-year effort progressed systematically:

• April 2016: Original report on post-quantum cryptography released
• July 2022: First candidates selected for standardization
• August 2023: Three draft Federal Information Processing Standards (FIPS) released
• January 2025: First public draft of recommendations for Key-Encapsulation Mechanisms
• March 2025: HQC algorithm selected for standardization

NIST set 2035 as the target for government agencies to adopt quantum-resistant encryption. Analysts now warn this timeline doesn’t work anymore. State actors might achieve quantum computing at scale by 2028. Many organizations must act now, as 2026 creates a critical window despite the threat seeming far away.

Quantum Computing Power Projections for 2026-2030

Recent industry surveys show 2026-2027 as the quantum turning point. About 39% of quantum computing vendors expect their customers to start using quantum computers operationally in 2026. This compares to 14% in 2025 and just 4% in 2024.

More than half (56%) of experts think 2026 will show quantum computers offering clear economic benefits over classical computing solutions [114]. The timeline looks like this:

• 2027: Nearly 29% of vendors expect commercial quantum computers to reach 100 logical qubits with 99.999% logical fidelity [114]
• 2030: Quantum computing market will hit $7.08 billion, growing at 31.64% CAGR
• Beyond 2030: Quantum computing will break RSA encryption standards

Organizations have limited time to prepare before quantum computers start showing practical advantages that could compromise existing security infrastructure.

The ‘Harvest Now, Decrypt Later’ Attack Strategy

The “Harvest Now, Decrypt Later” (HNDL) threat makes 2026 crucial even without operational full-scale quantum computers. This surveillance strategy works in three steps:

1. Attackers collect and store encrypted data now
2. They wait for quantum computing to mature
3. They decrypt stored information once quantum capabilities arrive [102]

Sensitive data with long-term value faces immediate risk. Intelligence agencies and nation-states likely run these attacks. They target government secrets, financial records, healthcare data, and intellectual property. Today’s harvested data could stay valuable for decades, so we need to act now despite the quantum threat seeming distant.

The industry sees 2026 as the quantum security milestone. The first post-quantum certificates should arrive around this time. Full standardization of quantum-resistant protocols in internet standards like TLS should follow in 2027.

As quantum computing continues to advance, it poses new challenges not only for encryption but also for industries such as manufacturing. The integration of quantum computing with robotics is expected to revolutionize the future of robotics in manufacturing, where quantum-powered machines could enhance automation and efficiency, while also raising concerns about data security in industrial systems.

Current Encryption Methods Vulnerable to Quantum Attacks

Modern encryption standards protect almost every part of our digital lives, yet most are fundamentally vulnerable to quantum attacks. These cryptographic safeguards weren’t built to handle the computing power that quantum computers will bring, which creates an unprecedented security risk.

RSA and ECC: The Backbone of Today’s Security

RSA (Rivest–Shamir–Adleman) and ECC (Elliptic Curve Cryptography) are the foundations of our current digital security infrastructure. The RSA system, created in 1977, builds security through the mathematical challenge of breaking down large composite numbers made from two prime numbers. ECC works by using the complexity of solving discrete logarithm problems on elliptic curves.

These asymmetric encryption systems protect everything from our online banking and shopping to business data and digital signatures. Their security relies on mathematical problems that classical computers find hard to solve. Quantum computers will soon break through this barrier.

Which Encryption Standards Will Fall First

ECC will likely become the first victim of quantum computing advances. It shows more weakness to quantum attacks than RSA and needs fewer qubits to crack, even though it offers similar security with shorter keys. RSA encryption with 2048-bit keys will fall next, needing about 4000 qubits to break.

Symmetric encryption methods like AES (Advanced Encryption Standard) show better resistance to quantum attacks but aren’t bulletproof. Grover’s algorithm poses a threat to symmetric cryptography, though doubling key sizes might counter these attacks. The biggest problem lies with asymmetric encryption – the core of secure communications. It remains especially weak against Shor’s algorithm, which can quickly factor large integers and compromise public-key systems.

Experts believe a quantum computer that can break 2048-bit RSA encryption might appear between 2030 and the late 2030s, though predictions vary. Some quantum-resistant algorithms might help solve this problem:

• Lattice-based cryptography, which uses mathematical lattices and vectors
• Code-based approaches like the classic McEliece algorithm
• Multivariate cryptography, which relies on solving complex equation systems

Data with Long-Term Value at Immediate Risk

The scariest part is that our data faces risks right now through “Harvest Now, Decrypt Later” attacks. Bad actors can capture encrypted transmissions—both the symmetric key and protected data—and wait until quantum computers can crack the encryption.

Information that needs long-term protection faces the biggest danger:

• Government secrets and classified information
• Financial records and loan application data
• Healthcare information and patient records
• Intellectual property and trade secrets

Quantum computing threatens not just future communications but puts all previously captured encrypted data at risk. NIST warns that a device capable of breaking current encryption could emerge within a decade, “threatening the security and privacy of individuals, organizations and entire nations”.

Of course, any data not encrypted with quantum-safe standards should be treated as compromised, especially when that information needs to stay secret for decades.

Post-Quantum Cryptography: The Race for New Solutions

The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has finalized its first three post-quantum encryption standards after an eight-year global competition, which marks a vital milestone to protect data against quantum threats. These new standards are our best defense against the looming quantum computing security risks.

NIST’s Finalist Algorithms Explained

NIST evaluated 69 candidate algorithms submitted in 2016 and selected four quantum-resistant algorithms in July 2022. The finalists include:

• ML-KEM (formerly CRYSTALS-Kyber) – Selected as the primary standard for general encryption and key exchange
• ML-DSA (formerly CRYSTALS-Dilithium) – Designated as the primary standard for digital signatures
• SLH-DSA (formerly SPHINCS+) – Chosen as a backup signature method using a different mathematical approach
• FN-DSA (formerly FALCON) – Selected for applications requiring smaller signatures than Dilithium can provide

These algorithms are the foundations of the Federal Information Processing Standards (FIPS) 203, 204, and 205, officially published in August 2024.

Lattice-Based vs. Hash-Based Approaches

Lattice-based cryptography leads the way in post-quantum solutions, with three of NIST’s selected algorithms based on this approach. The security of lattice-based systems depends on complex mathematical problems:

• Shortest Vector Problem: Finding the shortest vector in a multi-dimensional grid
• Closest Vector Problem: Determining the closest lattice vector to a given point
• Learning With Errors (LWE): A system with random arrays and vectors with small errors

Hash-based cryptography relies on the one-way nature of hash functions. SLH-DSA (SPHINCS+) uses this approach as a mathematical backup and offers security through completely different principles than lattice-based methods. This diversity provides vital protection if vulnerabilities appear in either approach.

Implementation Challenges for Legacy Systems

Organizations now face major challenges in adopting these new algorithms. A recent survey showed that 48% of federal government’s cyber officials pointed to legacy systems as their main barrier to implementing post-quantum standards. Organizations must think about these factors during the transition period:

• Crypto-agility: Building flexible cryptographic systems that can adapt to new algorithms quickly
• Hybrid approaches: Using both classical and post-quantum algorithms during transition
• Performance impacts: Managing the computational costs of more complex operations

The US government needs an estimated $7.10 billion between 2025 and 2035 to transition to post-quantum cryptography. This figure shows the magnitude of this vital security challenge.

Preparing Your Data Before the Quantum Threat Materializes

Organizations must act now to prepare for quantum threats, even though they seem far away. Intelligence agencies already use “harvest now, decrypt later” strategies. Your data protection approach needs to evolve to stay secure in the quantum era.

Crypto-Agility: Building Flexible Security Systems

Crypto-agility and flexibility are the foundations of quantum preparation. Your organization needs to know how to switch between encryption mechanisms quickly without disrupting operations. This needs detailed visibility of encryption usage in your systems and quick remediation when vulnerabilities surface. Organizations can replace outdated cryptographic assets through automation when they have crypto-agility. This protects them against future quantum threats and current security challenges like zero-day exploits.

Data Classification for Quantum Risk Assessment

Your quantum security efforts need proper prioritization. Start with an organizational quantum-risk assessment to understand potential effects. Create an inventory of assets that use cryptography and prioritize them based on business value and vulnerability. Document these key details for each asset:

• The sensitivity level and regulatory classification
• Required storage lifetime and long-term value
• Current cryptographic protection methods

This assessment helps you spot data that’s vulnerable to “harvest now, decrypt later” attacks. These attacks target government secrets, healthcare records, and intellectual property with decades-long value.

Migration Roadmap to Quantum-Resistant Systems

The UK’s National Cyber Security Center suggests this three-phase migration approach:

• Phase 1 (through 2028): Identify vulnerable cryptographic services and develop migration plans
• Phase 2 (2028-2031): Execute high-priority upgrades as PQC standards mature
• Phase 3 (2031-2035): Complete transition for all systems and services

Recent studies show 86% of organizations feel unprepared for post-quantum cybersecurity. Another 84% plan to adopt quantum-safe solutions within 2-5 years. This makes roadmap creation urgent.

Budget Planning for the Quantum Security Transition

Organizations must balance quantum security spending against other priorities. COTS product users should talk to vendors about their post-quantum roadmaps. Understanding implementation timelines and costs becomes crucial. Small businesses might transition smoothly through service provider updates. Larger organizations and critical infrastructure operators should expect substantial investment.

Quantum computing could drastically change the way machine learning algorithms function. Understanding the machine learning algorithm explained will help you grasp how these algorithms might evolve in the quantum era and how they will need new encryption strategies to protect the data they process.

Conclusion

Quantum computing threatens to break most modern encryption methods. Data security has become a critical concern for organizations worldwide. Though full-scale quantum computers might take years to materialize, the “harvest now, decrypt later” threat requires immediate action.

This piece explores everything in quantum security:

• Quantum computing’s fundamental challenge to current encryption
• Why 2026 marks a pivotal moment in quantum computing development
• Vulnerabilities in RSA and ECC encryption standards
• NIST’s progress toward quantum-resistant cryptography
• Steps organizations need to prepare

The quantum threat timeline shrinks each day. Organizations should begin their quantum security experience now. They need to assess their cryptographic assets, develop migration plans, and build crypto-agile systems. NIST’s post-quantum standards provide hope, but waiting until quantum computers arrive will be too late to protect sensitive data.

Quantum security demands immediate attention, not distant concern. Today’s encrypted data faces real risks from future quantum capabilities. This risk especially affects long-term valuable information like intellectual property, financial records, and healthcare data.

Of course, quantum computing brings unprecedented challenges to cybersecurity. Notwithstanding that, organizations that prepare early will protect their data better when quantum computers reach their full potential. Quantum security preparation cannot wait until tomorrow – it must happen today.

FAQs